Peer Review Guidelines and Responsibilities
Peer reviewers play an essential role in maintaining the integrity, quality, and reliability of academic publishing. By adhering to high standards of ethical conduct, reviewers ensure that the review process remains transparent, fair, and constructive. Below are the guiding principles for reviewers in our peer review process:
Confidentiality
- Treat all submitted manuscripts as confidential documents.
- Do not share or discuss the manuscript with anyone except as authorized by the editorial office.
Objectivity and Fairness
- Provide unbiased, constructive feedback.
- Base reviews solely on the manuscript's content, ensuring no discrimination based on the authors' nationality, gender, ethnicity, or beliefs.
Timeliness
- Accept review assignments only if you can meet the agreed deadline.
- Notify the editorial office promptly if circumstances prevent timely completion.
Conflict of Interest
- Decline to review a manuscript if you have any conflicts of interest, including personal, financial, or professional relationships with the authors.
Originality and Plagiarism
- Check the manuscript for signs of plagiarism and notify the editorial office if concerns arise.
- Avoid using unpublished material or ideas from the manuscript in your own work.
Constructive Feedback
- Provide clear, specific, and actionable suggestions for improvement.
- Avoid unprofessional language or tone.
Acknowledging Sources
- Ensure proper acknowledgment of relevant work cited in the manuscript.
- Point out instances where important references are missing.
By adhering to these principles, reviewers contribute to a rigorous and ethical review process, upholding the trust and credibility of our publication house. Thank you for your commitment to advancing academic excellence.
Interested in Becoming a Peer Reviewer?
Visit our Reviewer Application Page to learn more about our requirements and application process.